Make is rated 4.3 out of 5 from 97 reviews by buyers who ordered from make.com.
68% of reviewers passed full ID verification. Every review is matched to a real order and screened before publishing.
Provided by Make
Make offers workflow and automation software.
Czechiakalhoty dobre, ale nohavice o dva centimetry delsi. JINAK v poradku.
Sorry the suction failed on a textured table. We now say so on the product page rather than claiming it works everywhere. Regards, Mark
IrelandThe client portal does the job and the alerting is noisy enough that people have started ignoring it. The billing portal works well for our main market and the data for our smaller markets is noticeably thinner. Fair value for what we use.
GermanyStrategy was sound, execution slightly behind schedule by about 3 each month The integration took our developers 8 because two of the documented fields had been renamed. We get value from it, but we only use about a third of what we pay for. The onboarding process is a real improvement on what we had, with a reporting delay of about forty-eight hours. Good, with room to improve.
GermanyThe platform is good but onboarding took 9 rather than the two weeks promised in the pitch. Good communication during the project and almost none between projects. Support is knowledgeable and only available in one time zone, wich huuurts our US team. Good partner overall, though the first two months were slower than we expected. Happy, not evangelical.
United KingdomGood communication during the project & almost none between projects. The reporting dashboard does the job and the alerting are noisy enough that people have started ignoring it. Still the best option we found.
United StatesThe integration took our developers 2 because two of the documented fields had been renamed. Onboarding was thorough and the training was a single session with no follow-up material. The keyword research module has occasional data gaps that resolve themselves within a day, wich undermines trust slightly. The monthly call is useful when it happens and has been rescheduled four times. Results are solid and the reporting is harder to read than it needs to be. We have asked for two changes.
Hey Linda, You are right about the instructions. A written version in English now ships in every box.
United StatesService is good and the contract has a twelve-month minimum, which we felt on month two. The client portal is good but the permissions model is all or nothing, so I cannot give a contractor limited access.
Fair point on the sizing. We have added the measured chest and sleeve length to every product page since. Ollie and the team
United Kingdomthe onboarding process are a real improvement on what we had with a reporting delay of about forty-eight hours. The link building programme is powerful and the learning curve meant only two of our five users actually use it. Still the best option we found.
SwitzerlandWe cancelled a second product mid-term and they PRORATED the refund without an argument. The API is documented with working examples and the rate limits are published rather than discovered.
support is knowledgeable and only available in one time zone, which hurts our US team . The support desk does the job and the alerting is noisy enough that people have started ignoring it.
